Kurtis Kolt and Jake Skakun

17
Mar 2011
On Corkage
Wine by 
Jake
  at 1:14 pm | 8 Comments »


Bollinger’s Vieilles Vignes Francaises, Blanc de Noirs – some of the most terroir-driven Champagne available – negociant or otherwise.

I may get empty wine bottles hurled at me from my fellow sommeliers the next time I walk past their eateries, but I’m about to make a case for corkage, a poignant issue of sorts. For anyone unfamiliar, corkage refers to the act of a diner bringing his or her own wine into a restaurant, which then may be subject to a fee. This post is inspired by an article Glen Korstrom ran in Business in Vancouver highlighting possible changes to the liquor system with Christie Clark as our new Premier. While I feel that there are a dozen laws perhaps more démodé than corkage, Glen chose this as one to feature to his readers and it’s one worth exploring. I was laconically quoted as supporting a change and mentioned that from a business point of view, the profit margins are great for not having to invest in any inventory. I wanted to expand my stance a little further. Your subscription is required to read the original article, but you can view a scanned version here.

This may be a good time for a disclaimer… The thoughts expressed in this post are those completely of the author and not of any fine establishment he may work at. Basically, If you show up at my restaurant on Friday night with a bottle of Yellow Tail in your hand, I’ll feign ever having met you. You get the point.

The fact of the matter is, corkage in BC is a common practice. I’ve brought bottles of wine into some of the finest restaurants in the city and will continue to do so in the future. Obviously, these are arrangements done beforehand and I would never show up unannounced with bottles in tow. What is the government gaining by keeping it illegal? They have a monopoly on all wine sold in the province as it is, and therefore shouldn’t be concerned about not getting their tax somewhere (the tax I technically paid at the shop will be the same that the restaurant would have paid). I’m sure there isn’t a conscious government effort to keep corkage illegal, but it’s rather a bureaucratic vestige, like many of our wine laws are, from a time long ago. I’m supportive of any reform that reduces the control our government has in the sale of wine and I’m supportive of restaurants having the right to choose whether they allow or forbid their clients to bring in their own wine.

Where I feel this would benefit diners the most, is in the instance of places that have affordable, high quality cuisine, but don’t have a strong wine program; for instance, Asian spots that likely sell very little wine as it is. I’d love to take a good bottle of Vouvray into Phnom Penh in Chinatown or a Fino Sherry or Champagne into my favourite sushi restaurants like Toshi. This is enhancing the experience for the guest while the restaurant pads their sales with pure gross profit from the $10 or $20 they choose to charge. If the restaurants have strong wine programs, chances are less likely that guests will feel the need to bring in wine. My experience in San Francisco is that the restaurants which charge minimal corkage (like $5) or decide to waive it altogether, gain media exposure and positive sentiment from the public and presumably increase business; Taylor’s Automatic Refresher (renamed to Gott’s Roadside) in the Ferry Building is a good example – besides having great fast food and affordable wine prices, they are renowned for their $1 corkage fee. Isn’t ’61 Cheval Blanc supposed to be the best pairing for fast food burgers?

Many people fear that if it is made legal, restaurants will be inundated with pro-corkage diners and the sommelier’s wine list will be forgotten. I find the idea of a mass frenzy of BYOers to upper scale restaurants unrealistic; most diners will remain in the dark about the fact that this practice even exists and the rest will see it as too much of a hassle or will feel too uncomfortable showing up with a bottle. At one very busy, upper-scale-casual San Franciscan restaurant that I spent time at, it was uncommon to see more than 5 bottles of corkage per night. I’m talking about a place that does well over 200 covers daily, filled with diners who grew up in a culture of corkage. I could be completely naive, but I really don’t feel like it will change how the vast majority of people dine.

There are ways to control the volume of BYO bottles coming through the restaurant – the most omnipotent being, that if you don’t want people to bring in their own bottles, then don’t allow it. Restaurants that do practice it typically have rules that forbid bringing in labels that are already on the wine list, which prevent things getting a little weird. At places with successful wine programs, your corkage charge should dissuade people from bringing in bottles for the sole sake of being thrifty. Unless the restaurant offers terrible value, thriftiness shouldn’t be the point of bringing in wine. It should be to try exciting, old or rare bottles that the restaurant doesn’t stock and the guest thinks will compliment the cuisine. If you charge $30+ per bottle, the guest will likely recognize that they can get much better value by ordering off your list, and probably won’t bring anything that cost them less than $30. No one is going to bring in a bottle of Sawmill Creek for an additional $35 when they can get a much better bottle off the list for $45 – it really doesn’t make sense. Another way to encourage ordering from the restaurant list is to lower or waive corkage fees if the guest’s party also orders a bottle from the restaurant’s cellar.

My next point is a somewhat selfish one. Over the last couple years of working in places where corkage happens from time to time, I can’t remember an instance where the guest didn’t at least offer me a taste of the wine they brought. While this doesn’t do much for the bottom line of the business, it’s a great enabler of sommelier education.

A summary… I don’t think corkage should be illegal (we have enough laws that are impossible to enforce and are already ignored). The main reason is so my friends and I could drink good wine with our sushi (I’m getting sick of the cheap Gekkeinkan sake, which is actually made in California, by the way). Plus, I’ll get to try all the special bottles you bring into my restaurant (things like Bollinger Vieilles Vignes Francaises, perhaps?) You’ll probably only bring special bottles into my restaurant, because my fees will make it discouraging to use corkage as a means to be thrifty (if you’re really on a budget, ask me what I have for bin-ends and I will likely be able to set you up with a good value bottle). Corkage – perhaps I’m not taking it entirely seriously, but I really don’t think it’d be a big deal if we slackened things a little.

I’m looking forward to hearing what you think…


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

8 Responses:

Matt Daw said:

Hey Jake, great post. I’d love to see corkage legalized. Feeling like opening a special bottle doesn’t always line up with wanting to cook a meal at home that will match.


Liz said:

I loved BYO when I lived in Australia. We had a cellar full of aged wines and enjoyed taking one along when we went out for dinner. Not every restaurant in Australia allows BYO, and some charge much more corkage than others. Restaurants considered “fine dining” usually charged more, but often had better wine lists you could choose from if you didn’t want to pay the corkage.

Mind you, most restaurants didn’t have as good a wine list as they thought they had. For example, say they had Penfolds Grange on the wine list. Most would just have the most recent couple of vintages, and at a 100-150% mark up. It’s a no brainer to bring my bottle of aged Grange that is actually in its drinking window and pay $15-$25 corkage instead.

We eat out a lot less here because we can’t bring our own wine.


Shea said:

I was going to write a comment here, but realized I had too much to say so just wrote a post on my blog. Check it out if interested.


Lee said:

I don’t hear the owners of great restaurants in Toronto that opt into a corkage program whining.

Lets catch up with the rest of the world on this.


Lee said:

I believe a reduction in taxes will not happen, not the Canadian way we accept sin taxes, look at all those smokers, well drinkers have to just deal with it.
I do believe changes such as allowing corkage by choice of the establishment is a good idea that may be palatable to the government. Also the law preventing open wine to be sold over several days may lead to restaurants legally putting in Enomatic systems and offering more expensive wines by the glass, this change will add allot to Vancouver wine culture, I have had Barolos in Italy that at 200-300euro a bottle I would not have bought but a shared pour between 2 of us cost 25-50euro for a variety of great wines.
I believe to have things change people need to look at what little steps are possible, then take on the TAX issue later. I would like to see a better and vibrant wine scene in Vancouver and I think these two point are achievable.


Jake said:

Thanks Lee.

Restaurants are currently allowed to sell open wine past one day and many establishments in Vancouver sell wine from an enomatic machine – Joey’s Wine Room may have been the first, or at least somewhere near the first, a few years back. You may be confused with the fact that wine shops have laws hindering their use of enomatic machines – although wine shops unfortunately aren’t allowed to charge for tastes anyways. There’s more from us and a post from Winecouver in the past here: http://www.cherriesandclay.com/2010/08/06/on-this-enomatic-business/

I agree that it would be fantastic if Vancouver had a better wine scene (one of my dreams). The overwhelming number of nonsensical laws scattered throughout the selling and purchasing of wine makes our growth so much slower, but that being said, I feel like it has come along even in the last few years. We just have to work harder for it.

Cheers,
Jake


Shea said:

The tax issue is less of an internal one and more of a concern with respect to international trade treaties that the liquor taxes clearly violate. This is currently an important issue at the GATT trade talks. Free trade with Europe may not be possible without some form of compromise on our liquor taxes.


Leave a Reply